|Home||American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections|
|Anonymous User (login or join us)|
Subject: A century long conspiracy of pathological lies by hoaxers and charlatans
Berry Benson's poorly formulated "analysis" has clearly proven him to be an unreliable source for facts, reasoning and distillation concerning the Leo Frank Case. The primary reason for Berry Benson's many conclusions being so effortlessly discredited with the least amount of scrutiny, results from his analysis being so easily deconstructed and debunked using the official legal records from the Leo Frank trial and appeals. If anyone has even remote doubts in these regards, refer to the Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case Records (1913, 1914) and Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913).
Threnos clearly never studied the primary sources of the Leo Frank Case and is just regurgitating the unscholarly research she read from Pseudoscholars, Pseudohistorians and Pseudoacademics like Leonard Dinnerstein, Elaine Marie Alphin (2010), Harry Golden (1964, 1965), Steve Oney (2003), Jeffrey Melnick, Robert Seitz Frey (2002) and Matthew Bernstein - known propagandists and activists defending Leo Frank with racist, prejudiced and bigoted agendas against non-Jews. These pro-Frank activists shamelessly use racist blood-libel canards, false history, unsubstantiated rumors, and unmitigated disinformation campaigns in their failed attempts to rehabilitate Leo Frank. These authors have been thoroughly and indisputably discredited, because they were willing to perpetuate in their books, widely known frauds and hoaxes about the Leo Frank case.
I encourage anyone who is interested in learning what really happened during the Mary Phagan murder investigation and ensuing Leo Frank trial, to study the primary sources of the case, and draw their own conclusions, not form judgments based on unreliable secondary sources who pretend to be neutral, but have proven themselves to have racist political and social agendas against European-Americans and African-Americans.
Against the backdrop of numerous fraud-based books written on the Leo Frank affair, the only reliable secondary source book published about the case in the last 60 years is, 'The Murder of Mary Phagan' (1989) by Mary Phagan Kean. Her timeless book now dispells a century of smears and defamation by the Jewish Community against European-Americans and African-Americans.
The centennials of the double strangulation murder of Mary Phagan and Leo Frank, will inaugurate the century long perpetuated Leo Frank Conspiracy Scams being fully exposed to the light of truth for the whole world to witness and become part of the new history for future generations.
Perhaps someday there will finally be justice for Mary Phagan, who had her face pounded in by the serial child molester and B'nai B'rith President of Atlanta, Leo Max Frank.
Want to learn what really happened?
1. American State Trials Volume X, 1918, by John D. Lawson LLD.
2. Arguments of Hugh M. Dorsey at the Trial of Leo Frank, published in 1914.
3. The Frank Case (1913) by Anonymous (The first book)
4. The Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913)
5. Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Records (1913, 1914) 1,800 pages.
6. Watson's Magazine, August, September and October of 1915 by Tom Watson.
7. The Murder of Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (1989)
Subject: Some Good Reasoning
I docked this a star because I didn't like some of the racially bigoted aspects.
There was something Benson didn't mention.
I do believe also that Conley wrote the note starting "mam" first. It is only logical that this would be the first one since it starts off being addressed to a person. The theme of Mary being raped plays through to the 2nd note written on the pad of paper found beside her body. They aren't really seperare notes they are one letter:
"mam that negro hire down here did this i went to make water and he push me down that hole a long tall negro black that hoo it wase long tall sleam negro i wright while play with me he said he wood love me land down play like the night witch did it but that long tall black negro did by his slef"
However, Benson failed to mention that the fact that both notes were written on two very different sheets also proves towards Frank's innocence. If Frank had dictated the notes to Conley in his office why would they be on seperate papers? Frank's office would be full of the same paper. Why would Leo Frank think it was believable that Mary Phagan while in the act of being raped had found two different pieces of paper? Subsequently Conley claimed that the first one he wrote on was the one that came from the pad of paper that had been found beside Mary, a pad that still had leaves on it. Why would Frank have had him write on another sheet altogether?
It makes more sense that the paper used for the notes was found out of necessity. Conley first found the carbon paper with the Pencil heading. He wrote on this. Being prone to rattle on and embellish he wanted to print more. This time when he went looking he found the note pad. Think about it logically. If this had been found first, having many sheets of paper, it would have been used first. However, Conley wasn't smart enough to think about this reasoning at the time. His main concern for writing the notes was pinning the murder on another black man, who looked somewhat different than him, William Nolle.
This could further validate Alonzo Mann's statment that he had seen Conley with Mary's body. Conley was worried the boy could still come forward and say he had seen a black man with Mary. Conley needed to frame another black man hoping the boy would not be able to completely identify him only that it was a black man.
Conley was unable to sign Mary's name to the note not being aware of what her name was. Leo Frank would have known it.
Benson also fails to mention that Conley's ties to Lorena Jones may have been so strong that he ultimately did not want to flee after Phagan's murder.
|Ocr:||ABBYY FineReader 8.0|
|Rights:||Published in 1914, No Longer in Copyright|